Tag Archive

The ROAP Finals brought to a close the inaugural editions of our advanced remote oral advocacy and cross-examination courses, by featuring the most persuasive and skilled participants on each course.The recording is available here. The outcome of the finals was determined by a panel of world-class arbitrators consisting of The Honorable Charles N. Brower (President), Wendy Miles QC and Professor Stephan W. Schill. The winners were: Trisha Mitra and expert Vladimir Nefediev for the cross-examination course, and Heather Clark and Elizabeth Chan for the oral submissions course. The other finalists were: Vanessa Moracchini and expert Nikki Coles for the cross-examination course, and Clàudia Baró Huelmo and Camilla Gambarini for the oral submissions course. This inaugural ROAP edition was dedicated to the late … Read More

This ROAP Mock Hearing featured the following: Tribunal and Observer: Heather CLARK, Mateusz GERLACH, Vishwam JINDAL, Shadha ZAWAWI Counsel for Claimant: Thomas W. DAVIS and Iris KOBERG Counsel for Respondent: Riccardo FAVARO and Bart WASIAK Matter: Argentina’s consent to the mass claims and their admissibility under the ICSID framework in Abaclat and Others v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/5. See here for the Decision on Jurisdiction and Admissibility of 4 August 2011, and here for the Dissenting Opinion of the same date. Find out more about the ROAP Mock Hearings here. With the support of:

This ROAP Mock Hearing featured the following: Tribunal and Observer: Zafar ABBAS, Phuong-Trinh NGUYEN POTTER, Aparna PUJAR, Ricardo SARAIVA Counsel for Claimant: Daniela CALA and Camilla GAMBARINI Counsel for Respondent: Srishti JAIN and Francesca SALERNO Matter: Argentina’s consent to the mass claims and their admissibility under the ICSID framework in Abaclat and Others v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/5. See here for the Decision on Jurisdiction and Admissibility of 4 August 2011, and here for the Dissenting Opinion of the same date. Find out more about the ROAP Mock Hearings here. With the support of:

This ROAP Mock Hearing featured the following: Tribunal and Observer: Aruna DE SILVA, Matthew MORANTZ, Patrick O’REILLY SC, Karan RUKHANA Counsel for Claimant: Gordon McALLISTER and Olga OWCZAREK Counsel for Respondent: Jemima ROE and Bhushan SATISH Matter: Argentina’s consent to the mass claims and their admissibility under the ICSID framework in Abaclat and Others v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/5. See here for the Decision on Jurisdiction and Admissibility of 4 August 2011, and here for the Dissenting Opinion of the same date. Find out more about the ROAP Mock Hearings here. With the support of:

This ROAP Mock Hearing featured the following: Tribunal and Observer: Thomas W DAVIS, Riccardo FAVARO, Raluca DANCIU, Olena GOLOVTCHOUK Counsel for Claimant: Zafar ABBAS and Heather CLARK Counsel for Respondent: David LEWIS and Ricardo SARAIVA Matter: the merits of the CAM Final award in case no. 8416 of 28 November 2017. Find out more about the ROAP Mock Hearings here. With the support of:

This ROAP Mock Hearing featured the following: Tribunal and Observer: Baba Lawal ALIYU, Tilbe BIRENGEL, Elizabeth CHAN, Joana GRANADEIRO Counsel for Claimant: Paloma CARRASCO and Sebastian MEJIA Counsel for Respondent: Nicolas PRALICA and Nominchimeg ODSUREN Matter: Argentina’s consent to the mass claims and their admissibility under the ICSID framework in Abaclat and Others v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/5. See here for the Decision on Jurisdiction and Admissibility of 4 August 2011, and here for the Dissenting Opinion of the same date. Find out more about the ROAP Mock Hearings here. With the support of:

This ROAP Mock Hearing featured the following: Tribunal and Observer: Camilla GAMBARINI, Gordon McALLISTER, Margaux MERY, Revantha SINNETAMBY Counsel for Claimant: Matthew MORANTZ and Shadha ZAWAWI Counsel for Respondent: Laura ALAKIJA and Vishwam JINDAL Matter: the merits of the CAM Final award in case no. 8416 of 28 November 2017. Find out more about the ROAP Mock Hearings here. With the support of:

This ROAP Mock Hearing featured the following: Tribunal and Observer: Srishti JAIN, Olga OWCZAREK, Luciana RICART, Oliver SPACKMAN Counsel for Claimant: Isaiah BOZIMO and Phuong-Trinh NUGYEN POTTER Counsel for Respondent: Mateusz GERLACH and Karan RUKHANA Matter: the merits of the CAM Final award in case no. 8416 of 28 November 2017. Find out more about the ROAP Mock Hearings here. With the support of:

This ROAP Mock Hearing featured the following: Tribunal and Observer: Iris KOBERG, Victor ORELLANA, Nicolas PRALICA, Bart WASIAK Counsel for Claimant: Aanchal BASUR and Ali Dussah ZUBAIRU Counsel for Respondent: Aparna PUJAR and Alejandro SOLARES Matter: the merits of the CAM Final award in case no. 8416 of 28 November 2017. Find out more about the ROAP Mock Hearings here. With the support of:

This ROAP Mock Hearing featured the following: Tribunal and Observer: Paloma CARRASCO, Sebastian MEJIA, Nominchimeg ODSUREN, Bhushan SATISH Counsel for Claimant: Elizabeth CHAN and Patrick O’REILLY SC Counsel for Respondent:  Clàudia BARÓ HUELMO and Joana GRANADEIRO Matter: the merits of the CAM Final award in case no. 8416 of 28 November 2017. Find out more about the ROAP Mock Hearings here. With the support of: